Frequently Asked Question

04. Description of the GM
Last Updated 9 months ago

The Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA) has developed a comprehensive Grievance Mechanism (GM) to address and resolve complaints and grievances from stakeholders affected by its operations and projects. This chapter provides a detailed description of the GM, outlining its structure, process flow, and the key components that ensure its effectiveness and efficiency.

Structure of the GM

The GM is structured to facilitate easy access and efficient handling of complaints at multiple levels of EDSA’s operations, ensuring that grievances are managed close to their origin and escalated appropriately when necessary.

  1. Local Level (Tier 1): At the local level, grievances are first addressed where they arise. Local GM representatives are trained to handle initial complaints directly related to project impacts, customer service issues, or operational concerns.
  2. Regional Level (Tier 2): If grievances are not resolved at the local level or are of a more serious nature involving broader implications, they are escalated to the regional level. Regional managers have the authority to address more complex issues and mobilize additional resources if needed.
  3. Central Level (Tier 3): The most complex grievances, especially those involving legal or extensive financial implications, are handled at the central level by EDSA’s head office. This level involves senior management and, if necessary, external legal and technical advisors.

Process Flow

The GM follows a structured process flow to ensure that all complaints are addressed systematically:

  1. Grievance Submission: Stakeholders can submit grievances through various channels, including a dedicated online portal, email, toll-free telephone numbers, and physical complaint boxes located at EDSA offices and project sites.
  2. Acknowledgment and Registration: Every grievance received is acknowledged within 24 hours, and a unique grievance ID is assigned for tracking purposes. This ensures transparency and allows the complainant to follow the progress of their case.
  3. Initial Assessment and Categorization: Grievances are assessed and categorized based on their nature and severity. This step determines the urgency and level (local, regional, or central) at which the grievance should be addressed.
  4. Investigation and Resolution: An appropriate GM representative conducts a thorough investigation to gather facts and context. Based on the findings, a resolution is proposed and implemented.
  5. Feedback and Closure: Complainants are informed of the resolution outcome. If unsatisfied, they have the option to appeal the decision, triggering a review by the next higher level in the GM structure.
  6. Documentation and Learning: All grievances and their resolutions are documented in a central database. This data is regularly analyzed to identify trends, inform improvements in EDSA’s operations, and enhance the GM.

Key Components

Several key components underpin the effectiveness of the GM:

  1. Accessibility: Multiple accessible channels for submitting grievances ensure that all stakeholders, regardless of location or background, can easily access the GM.
  2. Transparency: Clear communication about the GM process, timelines for resolution, and the status of grievances promotes transparency and builds trust among stakeholders.
  3. Impartiality: Grievances are handled by trained and neutral personnel to ensure impartiality and fairness in the resolution process.
  4. Confidentiality: Sensitive information is handled confidentially to protect the identities and privacy of the stakeholders involved.
  5. Continuous Improvement: Regular reviews and updates to the GM process ensure it remains effective and responsive to stakeholder needs and operational changes.

EDSA's GM is a critical tool for managing stakeholder relations and ensuring that all grievances related to its operations are handled efficiently and fairly. By adhering to the principles of accessibility, transparency, impartiality, confidentiality, and continuous improvement, the GM enhances EDSA's accountability and responsiveness, contributing to better project outcomes and increased stakeholder satisfaction.

This website relies on temporary cookies to function, but no personal data is ever stored in the cookies.
OK

Loading ...